I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Waning Gibbous - The Moon starts losing light on the right side. (Northern Hemisphere)
，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
（一）故意散布谣言，谎报险情、疫情、灾情、警情或者以其他方法故意扰乱公共秩序的；
Gamma-Rapho/Getty Images
第六条 国务院有关部门和有关地方人民政府对原子能研究、开发和利用活动，在科学技术奖励、产业发展、财政、税费等方面，按照国家规定给予政策支持。